Withdrawal Agreement Bad Points

Very good points, especially the counterproductive effects of Wightman. Trolling in this case („ever closer union”.. really?!) was, I thought, black humor, but in retrospect, it was likely that it would provoke a strong reaction. The Northern Ireland Protocol aims to avoid an Irish trade border, whether or not it is an agreement. However, if there is no general trade agreement and the UK and an EU cannot agree on how the protocol should work, then it is not clear what would happen or how the control of goods entering and entering the republic would be managed. The Ministry of Finance has calculated that the cost to the republic`s economy could be up to three percentage points of the GDP growth rate in 2021 due to a situation without a trade agreement. take all appropriate measures to ensure that their assistants are aware of and comply with points 2, 3, 4, 5, 9 and 10. The Political Declaration provides that adequacy status will be granted to the United Kingdom before the end of the transition period until December 2020 and confirms that the European Commission will start the adequacy test as soon as possible after the withdrawal of the United Kingdom, Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein, the Kingdom of Norway and, where applicable, of the Swiss Confederation — corresponding agreements with the United Kingdom have concluded and applied what applies to citizens of the Union; and I suggest (hesitantly) that this compulsion to reach an agreement may have had a number of problematic results, although you should give me some points of pure speculation. It is conceivable that Johnson`s government, under pressure from foreign and domestic policy, concluded the Withdrawal Agreement (including the Northern Ireland Protocol) and signed the Political Declaration on the Future Relationship, only to complete the irreversible part of the Brexit process, the withdrawal. When the exit phase is over, the process will move to the international level, where Johnson and his government may have postulated that enforcement mechanisms would be weaker and that the UK would enjoy more bargaining power. Accept in a hurry, calmly ignore commitments, in other words.

In addition, it may have been considered that not all aspects of the political declaration that appealed to Brexiteers – such as the recognition of the need for a level playing field in the context of an economic partnership – were legally binding and could therefore be thrown overboard or significantly reshaped in negotiations on the future relationship after the exit date. .