For its part, India is committed to increasing transparency, separating its civilian and military nuclear facilities and placing civilian facilities as part of IAEA protection measures.  In addition, India has pledged to continue its unilateral moratorium on nuclear testing and to strengthen measures to limit the transfer of nuclear technologies to States and non-decing actors. The agreement also allowed India to continue to update and strengthen its national export control rules. The nuclear agreement between India and the United States was launched in 2005, after nearly 30 years of U.S. sanctions since India tested its first nuclear weapon (1974). July 14, 2008: In your opinion, the IAEA will meet on 1 August to discuss the indian-specific safeguard agreement. As a result of the pacts, specific agreements were reached on uranium imports from France, Kazakhstan, Australia, Canada and Russia.  Following the Fukushima nuclear accident in 2011, significant improvements have been made to improving nuclear safety. These improvements include, among other things, the addition of functions to maintain the safety of facilities in the event of a natural disaster. update assessments of the potential effects of earthquakes and floods; New facilities to better deal with potential damage to the reactor core; and build emergency preparedness capabilities. The blockade has had some impact on India`s plans to monitor nuclear energy and establish bilateral relations with other supplier countries.
Section 17B of the Act allowed a responsible operator to recover compensation from suppliers in the event of a nuclear accident, with liability maintained for a potentially indeterminate period.  This has become a major challenge in the India-U.S. Agreement 123, as it violated international standards of redress in nuclear civil liability agreements, which impose sole liability on operators. India signed an international treaty called the Convention on Supplemental Compensation for Nuclear Damage, which caused concern among its American counterparts due to a divergence in the adoption of the international treaty and Indian national laws. However, during President Barack Obama`s visit to India in 2015, a compromise was reached between the two sides and India agreed to create an insurance pool to protect companies that build reactors in the country. India would thus relieve investors of the payment clause of huge compensation in the event of an incident.  The issue of civil liability poses a challenge to India and other states in establishing bilateral and multilateral relations in the area of civil cooperation in the field of nuclear energy. The interaction between India and the United States suggests the need to develop innovative solutions at national and international levels. While the Bar of the Hyde Act is explicit for Indian tests, the NSG waiver is implicit but unwavering.
The waiver of the NSG is distinctively enshrined in the NSG guidelines, paragraph 16, which deals with the consequence of a „nuclear aircraft explosion”. Section 3 (e) of the waiver deals with this key paragraph that allows a supplier to request a special meeting of the NSG in the event of a review or any other „violation of a supplier-destination understanding” and to request an end to the cooperation. The Bush administration`s recent letter to Congress cited how this rule in paragraph 16 will effectively bind India under the Hyde Act, in the pain of a halt to all U.S.-sponsored multilateral cooperation.